English Devolution & Community Empowerment Bill — what it means for retail leases

We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.
Read more
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
Our expert arbitration lawyers help to resolve high-value, cross-border disputes quickly and efficiently.
We can act on arbitration that’s seated anywhere in the world but are typically instructed where there’s an English governing law clause in the parties’ arbitration agreement. Our clients range from high-net-worth (HNW) individuals to SMEs and both national and international businesses.
We offer a comprehensive legal service to guide you through each and every stage of the process and achieve the best possible resolution to conflicts — no matter how valuable or complex.
A form of alternative dispute resolution, arbitration offers parties a way to resolve a legal dispute — on a binding basis — outside of court. Since it’s a voluntary and consensual process, both parties must agree to submit their dispute to arbitration, which is usually provided for in a written agreement between the parties. Typically, the parties will have decided on arbitration and chosen the arbitral body within their written contract — such as the ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) or LCIA (London Court of international Arbitration).
While arbitration is the preferred method for resolving high-value, cross-border disputes between parties across different countries and jurisdictions, it’s also often used in smaller domestic disputes between contracting parties who simply prefer the benefits that the arbitration process can offer over the ‘traditional’ court process.
We know from our experience of arbitration that it can be expensive — particularly in complex and high-value cases. There are arbitrators’ fees and venue hearing fees to pay in addition to the usual legal costs and expenses. That’s why we offer competitive hourly rates and are also prepared to consider other alternative funding arrangements (where possible) to help meet your needs.
Our arbitration team forms part of our wider litigation practice, which is recognised in the top-tier of The Legal 500 2025 and praised for its “involvement in high-profile matters, including the ‘Wagatha Christie’ trial”. We also won the British Legal Awards Litigation Team of the Year award in 2022 and were nominated for Liverpool Law Society’s Team of the Year award in 2023.

Arbitration is commenced by a party indicating that a dispute has arisen and should be referred to arbitration in accordance with the parties’ written agreement. That agreement will usually set out the number of arbitrators, the legal place (or ‘seat’) of the arbitration and the procedural rules that’ll govern the arbitration.
The parties will then either select one arbitrator or a panel of three arbitrators (known as the Arbitral Tribunal) that have the appropriate expertise to resolve the dispute. The arbitration then largely follows the same dispute resolution process as a Court — the submission of claims and defences, disclosure of documents, exchange of witness evidence and a final hearing.
Yet unlike the court process, arbitration documents are confidential and hearings take place in private. This is often a key reason why parties choose arbitration over court proceedings — as well as the fact that it’s also considered to be quicker and more flexible than court proceedings.

Our arbitration offering is led by multi-award-winning commercial litigator Paul Lunt — a member of The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame who frequently advises in relation in contentious commercial matters and arbitration disputes.
Jeff Lewis — who has practised since 1989 — is highly experienced in Arbitration proceedings and is very well regarded for his tenacity and dedication in fighting on behalf of his clients. Jeff has been consistently recognised in the top tiers of both The Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners throughout his career and is a fellow member of The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame.
Helen Otty brings a wealth of experience in arbitration disputes with 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience. She’s recognised as both a Recommended Lawyer and Next Generation Partner by The Legal 500, which describes her as “outstanding” and “a seasoned commercial litigator” who “advises on high-value international arbitrations, commercial and company disputes”.
Our Partners are ably supported by our wider arbitration team, which includes Matthew Moy (recognised as a Leading Associate in The Legal 500) as well as Imogen Duck, James Roby and Tom Feeny — all of whom have a wide array of expertise in contentious litigation matters and arbitration proceedings.
“Brabners' broad expertise is evident in its diverse caseload, spanning high-value international arbitrations, sports litigation and privacy and reputation management disputes.”
The Legal 500 2026
$50m joint venture dispute
Acting for a British Virgin Islands-based aviation company in respect of a joint venture dispute with a Cypriot-based company and an American individual concerning the sale of pre-owned aircraft on a worldwide basis. Proceedings were issued in an ICC arbitration worth in excess of USD $50m which resulted in the largest ‘win’ in our litigation history.
$20m ICC arbitration claim
Acting for Polish registered company in an ICC arbitration claim brought by an international hotel chain. Our clients brought significant counterclaims in a dispute valued in excess of USD $20m. This included challenging elements of the decision in the Swiss Courts and considering enforcement in other jurisdictions.
Multi-million-pound ICC arbitration claim
Acting for a UK-based subsidiary of a multinational engineering company headquartered in Germany in a multi-million-pound ICC arbitration claim brought by our client against a UK- and US-based aerospace manufacturing company.
Breach of Commercial Agents Regulations
Acting in an ICC arbitration for a UK-based agent against its German-based principal for a breach of Commercial Agents Regulations, obtaining an award in excess of €10m.
Defending arbitration claim
Acting for a national housing and construction company in defending an arbitration claim brought by a private individual who’d purchased a residential property from the company and alleged that the property had suffered from various building defects.

We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.
Read more

Individuals who want to take an employment case to a tribunal must first take part in a longer conciliation process.
Read more

Our litigation team achieved a successful outcome for Docutech Office Solutions Ltd in a major claim against a former employee and his new employer.
Read more

Our litigation team look an online defamation case study and how to take legal action after being subject to online defamation or harassment.
Read more

Andrew Tindall examines new guidance from the Senior Courts Costs Office on recovering probate costs.
Read more

The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Chair has announced that the first part of his final report will be published this Summer.
Read more

Our litigation team explores recent cases and what to do if you’re subjected to online defamation or harassment.
Read more

We explore how the Courts treat customers who have been charged “half secret” commissions by their energy brokers.
Read more

Solicitor Ashley Hurst found himself at the centre of regulatory action brought by the SRA.
Read more

Our litigation team explores the options businesses have when it comes to dealing with negative online reviews — whether the review is honest or dishonest.
Read more

Here, commercial litigator Glyn Lancefield outlines the proposed changes to the pre-action protocol for media and communications claims.
Read more

Experienced commercial litigator Matthew Moy explains what arbitration is and how the AA 2025 will help to clarify and refine key aspects of the arbitration process by improving efficiency, fairness and legal certainty.
Read more

The UK Supreme Court's judgment in Brown v Ridley and Another has important implications for adverse possession claims — particularly in boundary disputes.
Read more

The High Court ruled in favour of Iya Patarkatsishvili and Yevhen Hunyak in their case against William Woodward-Fisher on claims of fraudulent misrepresentation concerning a severe moth infestation.
Read more

The CJC report recommends that a bespoke Pre-Action Protocol be created for claims which, when issued at Court, will be suitable for allocation to the Multi-Track.
Read more

What can legally be done to combat deepfake technology? Hear from the team that secured the UK’s first settlement for a dispute concerning a political deepfake.
Read more

All civil litigation is subject to a Pre-Action Protocol which sets out the parties’ obligations before Court proceedings are commenced. The CJC states that “pre-action protocols play a crucial role in facilitating dispute resolution”.
Read more

What does the decision in Cheshire Estate & Legal Limited (CEL) v Blanchfield & Ors [2024] mean for company directors and shareholders? Our commercial litigators explain.
Read more

A recent Court of Appeal judgment has major implications for litigants dealing with breach of contract claims as well as anyone drafting liability clauses in contracts.
Read more

From building a family to creating Wills and trusts, buying or selling property, land or a business, planning for your succession or dealing with a crisis, it helps to have ready access to a multidisciplinary legal team that can support you with whatever life throws your way.
Read more

The Supreme Court's new rules take effect on 2 December 2024 as part of its 2023-2026 business plan to deliver a wide-ranging ‘Change Programme’.
Read more

In Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2024] UKSC 33, the Supreme Court's revised the long-standing legal principle around public body liability.
Read more

Costs have been determined in the matter of George v Cannell & LCA Jobs. Our lawyers explore if an award of nominal damages constitutes ‘success’ in Court?
Read more

We've been recognised again in The Times' Best Law Firms guide for 2025, with our commercial dispute resolution and family law teams receiving commendations.
Read more

Our litigation team has successfully appealed to the Supreme Court in a landmark ruling that’s described as being the leading case on malicious falsehood and likely to have significant implications for media law.
Read more
Loading form...