Deepfakes & AI fraud — the new digital battlefield for retailers

We explore why retailers are particularly affected by deepfakes and the implications around data protection, IP, advertising compliance and more.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
Like all businesses, public relations (PR) firms and consultants face a wide range of potential claims. Client complaints are often the first sign of trouble. Many stay low level — for example, fee‑related disputes where a client doesn’t want to pay and uses a ‘complaint’ as leverage. In those cases, the issue is often little more than a debt‑collection exercise.
However, not all complaints stay that way. When concerns escalate or when a client feels let down, misinformed or exposed, those early grumbles can quickly develop into something more serious and PR firms can find themselves facing allegations that go well beyond dissatisfaction with fees.
Here, Glyn Lancefield from our litigation team explores the key types of claims that can follow when an initial complaint begins to escalate and outlines some practical steps that PR firms can take to manage the risks.
Professional negligence claims are usually thought of as being against professionals providing more ‘traditional’ services such as lawyers, accountants and surveyors. However, just like other service providers, PR firms owe a duty of care to their clients. They may therefore be subject to a professional negligence claim if their work falls below the standard that could be expected from a ‘reasonably competent’ PR firm.
It may be hard for a court to assess that standard in a PR setting because the advice that PR firms provide is often more nuanced, subjective and subject to open textured considerations than in other sectors. On the face of it, this means that whatever advice was given could fall within the scope of reasonable competence. However, in reality, the legal risks may be higher for PR firms because PR advice may be more at risk of differing views about where the line of reasonableness should be drawn. Faced with any given PR crisis, experts sometimes disagree.
The relationship between a PR firm and its client is contractual and may also give rise to express obligations as well as an implied duty to provide services with reasonable care and skill. PR firms therefore face a breach of contract claim if their work falls below that standard, such as if an error or omission in the drafting of a press release leads to loss or damage. For example, should a statement actually have been given to a journalist making enquiries? The answer may not be as straightforward as it first appears.
Disgruntled clients can sometimes instruct lawyers to send letters if the client’s profile isn’t improved as much as they were hoping for or, even worse, if they feel that a reputation crisis has deepened due to ‘bad’ PR advice. The client’s own involvement or culpability can be conveniently overlooked.
Crisis management usually requires ‘on the spot’ advice to deal with an immediate and still evolving situation, so the risk of mistakes happening is high. While risk registers and plans can be important, the real issues are often unexpected. The risk is also increased by the environment in which PR advisers are working, a landscape that’s constantly changing to reflect the trends of social media and meet the appetite of the 24-hours a day news cycle.
PR firms also often handle their clients’ most sensitive commercial and personal information, giving rise to the risk of a data breach or breach of confidence claim if that information isn’t robustly protected or is used in ways that the client may not anticipate.
Clients may choose to reduce their own legal spend and avoid a risk of adverse costs by pursuing a grievance through a regulator or trade association rather than through the courts. Doing so may even give a client a ‘dry run’ to obtain an initial opinion on their dispute before they decide whether to refine their arguments in a court claim where the costs and risks are higher.
Our award‑winning litigation team supports PR firms at every stage of the complaints and claims process. We help clients to put the right measures in place to reduce the risk of disputes arising, manage complaints before they escalate and defend any claims that may ultimately be brought.
Talk to us by giving us a call on 0333 004 4488, sending us an email at hello@brabners.com or completing the contact form below.

Loading form...

We explore why retailers are particularly affected by deepfakes and the implications around data protection, IP, advertising compliance and more.

We discuss what mediation and other forms of ADR are, their benefits, when they’re most effective and how courts view parties who refuse to engage in them.

We outline the steps that retailers can take to contain an emerging online issue and the legal remedies available for responding to false statements.

We set out seven practical steps to help retailers to prepare, respond decisively and recover quickly when the unexpected happens.

We look at the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 and outline how the GDPR can apply to both organisations and individuals as data controllers.

We outline the Court of Appeal’s decision, consider how the Supreme Court is likely to approach the appeal and highlight five key takeaways.

We examine the CJC’s recommendations and their implications for funders, claimants and practitioners navigating this evolving area.

We explain where generative AI has the potential to damage individuals’ reputations and examine relevant case law from other jurisdictions.

Our award-winning litigation team has secured a High Court judgment in favour of Acasta European Insurance Company Limited.

We’re delighted to announce the opening of a new office in London, marking a major milestone at the end of a year defined by strong financial performance.

We share ten top tips for preventing partnership disputes and guidance on recognising the warning signs and responding effectively if conflict does arise.

We explore how the Court considered the requirement of promptness, the arguments made and what this means for claimants considering judicial review.

We explore the legal and reputational implications of dramatising ‘real life’ events for the screen.

We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.

Individuals who want to take an employment case to a tribunal must first take part in a longer conciliation process.

We're thrilled to have been commended in three separate categories in The Times Best Law Firms 2026.

Our litigation team achieved a successful outcome for Docutech Office Solutions Ltd in a major claim against a former employee and his new employer.

Our litigation team look an online defamation case study and how to take legal action after being subject to online defamation or harassment.

Andrew Tindall examines new guidance from the Senior Courts Costs Office on recovering probate costs.

The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Chair has announced that the first part of his final report will be published this Summer.

What happened in Gary Mond’s case? We explore why this offers more clarity to charity trustees around social media activity.

Our litigation team explores recent cases and what to do if you’re subjected to online defamation or harassment.

We outline the issues being faced by players, the actions clubs are taking and what legal protections are available to help prevent and prosecute abuse.

We explore how the Courts treat customers who have been charged “half secret” commissions by their energy brokers.

Solicitor Ashley Hurst found himself at the centre of regulatory action brought by the SRA.