DSARs in the age of AI — why you should resist the siren call of simplicity

Our data protection team examines the risks of relying on oversimplified legal arguments in DSAR disputes and highlights key lessons for data controllers.
Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com | Contact us
4 min read
Litigation & Disputes, Retail, Technology, Media & Telecoms, Reputation Management & Defamation

While in an ideal world, providing your customers with a great product or service will inspire positive reviews, it’s almost inevitable that the occasional customer may post a review that you consider to be unfair or overly critical. Other reviews can be malicious and make false statements or exaggerate problems.
With 89% of purchasing decisions impacted by negative reviews, you may want to know if and how you can take action to remove an online review to prevent damage to your business and reputation.
Here, Carys Thornton lays out your options when it comes to dealing with negative online reviews — whether the customer is being honest or dishonest about their experience…
When receiving a negative review, the first thing to consider is whether it’s a truthful reflection of the customer’s experience. This is because they may have legal defences if what they’re saying is true
Although the review may be upsetting to read, if a customer is dissatisfied with the product or service you provided to them, they’re well within their rights to post an honest review online.
Subsequently, there’s no legal basis to take action against an honest reviewer. However, you can attempt to engage with the reviewer to resolve the issues that resulted in the negative review. It’s often best to do this publicly, so that other potential customers can see how you treat your customers and that you’re proactive in addressing their concerns.
This can lead to the review being amended or even removed by the customer.
If a false or dishonest review is published about your business online — and causes (or is likely to cause) serious harm to your reputation — this could amount to defamation or ‘malicious falsehood’.
This means that you may be able to take legal action.
Where a review is anonymous, a good place to start (before turning to litigation) is with the Defamation (Operators of Websites) Regulations 2013.
This states that, under certain circumstances, a complaint can be made to the operator of the website on which the defamatory review was published. After receiving a complaint, the website operator has 48 hours to take action to enable you to identify the anonymous poster.
A failure to comply will mean that the website operator can become liable for defamation itself, so we find that complaints of this nature very often result in the reviews being removed from the website.
Where the reviewer can be identified, claims in defamation and malicious falsehood can be considered.
Under the Law in England and Wales, a defamatory statement can be defined as a written or spoken statement that’s published to someone other than the person to whom it relates, is untrue and tends either to:
Alternatively — or, as is often the case, additionally — a claim could be brought for malicious falsehood. As with defamation claims, malicious falsehood claims deal with the publication of false statements.
Damages can be assumed when the disputed words are deemed to cause financial damage to the claimant and published in writing or in respect of his office, professional calling, trade or business.
It’s rare for a claim to be the first port of call in any ‘bad review’ situation. Legal proceedings can be difficult to prove and a lengthy process may follow. Instead, it’s important to consider your options and develop the right tactical approach.
If you feel as though you’ve been defamed, our defamation and privacy litigation team can help.
Talk to us by giving us a call, sending us an email or completing our contact form below.
Loading form...

Our data protection team examines the risks of relying on oversimplified legal arguments in DSAR disputes and highlights key lessons for data controllers.

We outline the legal protections that may be available if you face a threat to expose personal information such as your sexual orientation.

We examine the key changes introduced by the Digital Omnibus on AI, what remains unchanged and how businesses should respond.

We explore the legal issues under consideration by the ICO and Ofcom and what the case tells us about the UK's future regulation of AI-generated content.

The Government's 'ending one-sided flexibility' consultation signals significant change for hospitality employers. We explore what employers need to know.

The Supreme Court's decision in Drelle v Servis-Terminal may provide a powerful new recovery option, with insolvency pressure able to be deployed immediately.

Amid debate over the Chelsea, Everton and Forest cases, Paul Lunt joined Total Sport to explain how football disciplinary decisions are reached and why sanctions can vary.

What can we learn from the BrewDog shareholder emails? We outline key compliance risks and practical steps to consider before sending communications.

We explore the ESPR’s implications for M&A and outline what businesses should be doing in response.

We outline some of the key commercial and legal considerations for parties considering a franchise arrangement.

We explore the allegations against Roblox, wider challenges of protecting children online and steps that platforms are expected to take.

We've announced our largest-ever round of Partner promotions, with six lawyers joining the partnership following another year of sustained growth.

We explore what Stargate UK reveals about the hidden energy cost of AI and break down what this means in practice.

We examine the issues at the heart of the claim and outline what the decision could mean for franchise businesses.

We explore the key insights shaping the future of games, digital creative and tech from this year’s FORMAT Group Summit.

We outline the pivotal role of the NOI in Beauty Bay’s administration and break down the key takeaways for retailers.

Live from Old Trafford, we explored the realities of geopolitical risk, security threats, commercial sustainability and the growing role of technology.

We explore the key changes and outline the practical steps that retailers need to take ahead of 2027.

We explore the tension between AI‑driven optimism and growing fears of an overinflated tech bubble.

We explore how commercial partnerships in motorsport are evolving and outline the practical considerations for sponsors and rights holders.

True North co-chair Michael Hayman breaks down how mood, behaviour and local leadership are influencing the economy.

We explore what the HFSS regime means in practice, break down how the ASA is applying the rules and outlines the steps that retailers should take now.

We explore four recent food VAT decisions — from KFC dip pots to poppadom snacks — highlighting the key takeaways and practical steps for businesses.

We explore how the Courts determined meaning in these decisions and what they signal for future reputation management claims.

We explore the decision, its legal context and its implications for selective distribution and online sales controls.