7 crisis management steps every retailer should have in place to respond efficiently & protect your brand

We set out seven practical steps to help retailers to prepare, respond decisively and recover quickly when the unexpected happens.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
4 min read
Litigation & Disputes, Retail, Technology, Media & Telecoms, Reputation Management & Defamation

While in an ideal world, providing your customers with a great product or service will inspire positive reviews, it’s almost inevitable that the occasional customer may post a review that you consider to be unfair or overly critical. Other reviews can be malicious and make false statements or exaggerate problems.
With 89% of purchasing decisions impacted by negative reviews, you may want to know if and how you can take action to remove an online review to prevent damage to your business and reputation.
Here, Carys Thornton lays out your options when it comes to dealing with negative online reviews — whether the customer is being honest or dishonest about their experience…
When receiving a negative review, the first thing to consider is whether it’s a truthful reflection of the customer’s experience. This is because they may have legal defences if what they’re saying is true
Although the review may be upsetting to read, if a customer is dissatisfied with the product or service you provided to them, they’re well within their rights to post an honest review online.
Subsequently, there’s no legal basis to take action against an honest reviewer. However, you can attempt to engage with the reviewer to resolve the issues that resulted in the negative review. It’s often best to do this publicly, so that other potential customers can see how you treat your customers and that you’re proactive in addressing their concerns.
This can lead to the review being amended or even removed by the customer.
If a false or dishonest review is published about your business online — and causes (or is likely to cause) serious harm to your reputation — this could amount to defamation or ‘malicious falsehood’.
This means that you may be able to take legal action.
Where a review is anonymous, a good place to start (before turning to litigation) is with the Defamation (Operators of Websites) Regulations 2013.
This states that, under certain circumstances, a complaint can be made to the operator of the website on which the defamatory review was published. After receiving a complaint, the website operator has 48 hours to take action to enable you to identify the anonymous poster.
A failure to comply will mean that the website operator can become liable for defamation itself, so we find that complaints of this nature very often result in the reviews being removed from the website.
Where the reviewer can be identified, claims in defamation and malicious falsehood can be considered.
Under the Law in England and Wales, a defamatory statement can be defined as a written or spoken statement that’s published to someone other than the person to whom it relates, is untrue and tends either to:
Alternatively — or, as is often the case, additionally — a claim could be brought for malicious falsehood. As with defamation claims, malicious falsehood claims deal with the publication of false statements.
Damages can be assumed when the disputed words are deemed to cause financial damage to the claimant and published in writing or in respect of his office, professional calling, trade or business.
It’s rare for a claim to be the first port of call in any ‘bad review’ situation. Legal proceedings can be difficult to prove and a lengthy process may follow. Instead, it’s important to consider your options and develop the right tactical approach.
If you feel as though you’ve been defamed, our defamation and privacy litigation team can help.
Talk to us by giving us a call, sending us an email or completing our contact form below.
Loading form...

We set out seven practical steps to help retailers to prepare, respond decisively and recover quickly when the unexpected happens.

AI is enhancing performance and even scouting future talent in elite sport. Sports technology and data are key to success, but come with legal risks.

We discuss the key opportunities and considerations shaping the future of sustainable AI and quantum‑powered technology.

We break down what the ICO found and outline three key steps that UK businesses should take now.

We break down what’s changing, where the risks sit and how businesses can turn this shift into an opportunity to prepare for the new rates landscape.

We explore how the UK’s shift to clean power is reshaping industry, infrastructure and the future of energy security.

We look at the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 and outline how the GDPR can apply to both organisations and individuals as data controllers.

We outline the Court of Appeal’s decision, consider how the Supreme Court is likely to approach the appeal and highlight five key takeaways.

We break down the key proposed reforms in the Digital Omnibus Package and outline what businesses should do to prepare.

We examine the CJC’s recommendations and their implications for funders, claimants and practitioners navigating this evolving area.

We explain where generative AI has the potential to damage individuals’ reputations and examine relevant case law from other jurisdictions.

We discuss the mounting dangers of AI-powered cybercrime across the world of sport with David Andrew — the Founder and Managing Partner of Tiaki.

We explain the importance of the Supreme Court decision and what it means for innovators looking to gain patent protection for computer-related inventions.

Our award-winning litigation team has secured a High Court judgment in favour of Acasta European Insurance Company Limited.

We’re delighted to announce the opening of a new office in London, marking a major milestone at the end of a year defined by strong financial performance.

We explore the types of claims that PR firms can face when an initial complaint escalates and outline some practical steps to manage the risks.

We outline the key takeaways from our Games Tech Connect session on how generative AI is being used in video game development.

We outline what you need to know about the UKIPO's proposed fee increases across patents, trade marks and designs.

We explain the impact of the cyber-attack on JLR's workforce and outline what to do to protect your business and minimise the impact if an incident occurs.

We outline eight key steps to put your organisation in the strongest position for a prompt and effective response to any cyber-attack.

Some tech businesses are exploring how their commercial frameworks could evolve through smarter, values-driven contracting.

We share ten top tips for preventing partnership disputes and guidance on recognising the warning signs and responding effectively if conflict does arise.

We explore recent examples of how brands are responding to dupe culture and outline practical steps that retail businesses can take to protect their brand.

We explore how the Court considered the requirement of promptness, the arguments made and what this means for claimants considering judicial review.

We explore safety considerations around Christmas markets and outline practical steps to comply with relevant safety legislation.