Mediation & other forms of ADR — practical guidance for resolving disputes outside of court
We discuss what mediation and other forms of ADR are, their benefits, when they’re most effective and how courts view parties who refuse to engage in them.
Civil Justice Council publishes recommendations to reform Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol
AuthorsGlyn Lancefield
4 min read
The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has published its Phase Two Report on Pre-Action Protocols, which includes specific recommendations regarding the Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol.
All civil litigation is subject to a Pre-Action Protocol which sets out the parties’ obligations before Court proceedings are commenced. The CJC states that “pre-action protocols play a crucial role in facilitating dispute resolution”. The recommendations regarding the Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol will be of interest to any litigant contemplating starting Judicial Review Proceedings or party receiving a Judicial Review Letter Before Claim.
I gotta have (good) faith, faith, faith
The CJC recommends that the Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol be amended to oblige the parties to apply in good faith the following five key principles:
- Starting Court proceedings should be a last resort.
- There must be an early exchange of relevant information.
- The parties should behave reasonably and proportionately.
- The parties must actively cooperate with each other to achieve the overriding objective.
- The parties should take reasonable steps to try to resolve or narrow their dispute.
In 2021, the CJC’s Interim Report suggested that in all Pre-Action Protocols there should be a good faith obligation to try to resolve or narrow disputes. The Phase Two Report now recommends that in Judicial Review cases there should be an enhanced good faith obligation to apply the above principles.
Duty of Candour
An important element of these principles is the ‘duty of candour’. Any party to a claim for Judicial Review has a duty of candour, which is a duty to provide the Court with the information that’s relevant to the issues and ensure that the Court has a true and comprehensive picture of the decision-making process that’s the subject of the case.
In a 2022 case, the Divisional Case determined that the duty of candour “applies to every stage of the proceedings, including letters of response, under the pre-action protocol…”. The CJC recommends that the enhanced good faith obligation in the Pre-Action Protocol should include the duty of candour accordingly.
Alternative dispute resolution
Some of the CJC recommendations that have received the most attention are around alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as mandatory mediation initiatives.
In Judicial Review cases, the CJC acknowledges that: “ADR in judicial review cases is rare. There are several reasons for this including that judicial review often involves a binary dispute on a legal issue which only the court can resolve. Some cases are so urgent ADR would impede, rather than facilitate, timely resolution”.
Despite this, we’ve successfully resolved Judicial Review disputes by ADR and believe that most parties in Judicial Review cases will welcome the CJC’s recommendation that the Pre-Action Protocol should prompt the intended Claimant to confirm in its Letter Before Claim that ADR has been considered and prompt the proposed Defendant in its Letter of Response to indicate whether it’s willing to engage in ADR.
The Court will consider whether case management directions should include provisions for ADR.
Pre-action costs
One of the advantages of the parties to a Judicial Review case attempting ADR pre-action is that settlement avoids the costs of dealing with Court proceedings.
The CJC has considered whether to recommend a new summary procedure for determining cost disputes in Judicial Review cases where settlement is agreed at the pre-action stage but there’s a dispute over the costs incurred.
Referring to not wanting to deter the parties from attempting settlement, the CJC states that it doesn’t consider such a summary cost procedure to be necessary. The parties to any Judicial Review case should seek to resolve cost disputes as part of any settlement.
Talk to us
If you’re facing or bringing a dispute, our award-winning litigation team is on-hand to advise you.
Talk to us by giving us a call on 0333 004 4488, sending us an email at hello@brabners.com or completing our contact form below.
Talk to us
Loading form...
Related insights
How retailers can protect their business from false or misleading claims — key legal & practical considerations
We outline the steps that retailers can take to contain an emerging online issue and the legal remedies available for responding to false statements.
International arbitration — the scope of supervisory jurisdiction & anti-suit injunctions following Star Hydro
We outline the Court of Appeal’s decision, consider how the Supreme Court is likely to approach the appeal and highlight five key takeaways.
How the CJC’s litigation funding reforms aim to restore certainty after PACCAR
We examine the CJC’s recommendations and their implications for funders, claimants and practitioners navigating this evolving area.
3 potential ways generative AI could lead to defamation claims
We explain where generative AI has the potential to damage individuals’ reputations and examine relevant case law from other jurisdictions.
Brabners secures favourable policy construction judgment for Acasta
Our award-winning litigation team has secured a High Court judgment in favour of Acasta European Insurance Company Limited.
London expansion & record revenues drive next phase of growth at Brabners
We’re delighted to announce the opening of a new office in London, marking a major milestone at the end of a year defined by strong financial performance.
PR under fire — what happens when clients sue?
We explore the types of claims that PR firms can face when an initial complaint escalates and outline some practical steps to manage the risks.
Navigating partnership conflict in law firms — 10 top tips to prevent disputes
We share ten top tips for preventing partnership disputes and guidance on recognising the warning signs and responding effectively if conflict does arise.
HyNot judicial review decision highlights the importance of acting promptly
We explore how the Court considered the requirement of promptness, the arguments made and what this means for claimants considering judicial review.
Lights, camera, litigation — The Lost King case
We explore the legal and reputational implications of dramatising ‘real life’ events for the screen.
English Devolution & Community Empowerment Bill — what it means for retail leases
We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.
Employment tribunal early conciliation period doubles to 12 weeks
Individuals who want to take an employment case to a tribunal must first take part in a longer conciliation process.
Restrictive covenant dispute — Brabners secures successful judgment for Docutech Office Solutions Ltd
Our litigation team achieved a successful outcome for Docutech Office Solutions Ltd in a major claim against a former employee and his new employer.
How the courts treat online defamation — removal order dismissed against domain name registrar
Our litigation team look an online defamation case study and how to take legal action after being subject to online defamation or harassment.
Probate costs recoverable in litigation: SCCO clarifies its position in key costs ruling
Andrew Tindall examines new guidance from the Senior Courts Costs Office on recovering probate costs.
Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry announces publication of the first part of its final report
The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Chair has announced that the first part of his final report will be published this Summer.
Defamation and harassment on social media — what to do if you’re a victim of online abuse
Our litigation team explores recent cases and what to do if you’re subjected to online defamation or harassment.
Half-secret commissions and informed consent between brokers and customers
We explore how the Courts treat customers who have been charged “half secret” commissions by their energy brokers.
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal clarifies appropriate use of Without Prejudice labels and SLAPP guidance
Solicitor Ashley Hurst found himself at the centre of regulatory action brought by the SRA.
How to deal with a negative online review about your business
Our litigation team explores the options businesses have when it comes to dealing with negative online reviews — whether the review is honest or dishonest.
Media and communications claims — could pre-action dispute resolution become compulsory?
Here, commercial litigator Glyn Lancefield outlines the proposed changes to the pre-action protocol for media and communications claims.
Arbitration Act 2025 — new legislation to strengthen UK’s position as dispute resolution leader
Experienced commercial litigator Matthew Moy explains what arbitration is and how the AA 2025 will help to clarify and refine key aspects of the arbitration process by improving efficiency, fairness and legal certainty.
Adverse possession claims — significant judgment a ‘win’ for practicality in boundary disputes
The UK Supreme Court's judgment in Brown v Ridley and Another has important implications for adverse possession claims — particularly in boundary disputes.
High Court sides with claimants in shocking moth infestation fraud case
The High Court ruled in favour of Iya Patarkatsishvili and Yevhen Hunyak in their case against William Woodward-Fisher on claims of fraudulent misrepresentation concerning a severe moth infestation.