FIFA’s new landmark women coaches rule — what clubs & governing bodies need to know

Competing in certain women’s tournaments must now include women in coaching roles on the bench. We explore the implications for clubs and NGBs.
Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com | Message our team
AuthorsIsobel NetherwoodMatthew Lavelle
5 min read

On 19 March 2026, FIFA announced a landmark change to its competition regulations: teams competing in certain women’s tournaments must now include women in coaching roles on the bench.
While the move has been widely welcomed as a positive intervention to improve gender representation in football coaching, it also raises important questions when considered through the lens of domestic employment law and recruitment.
Here, Isobel Netherwood and Matthew Lavelle explore FIFA’s new rule and its implications for clubs and national governing bodies (NGBs).
Under FIFA’s new regulations, teams participating in women’s international tournaments and FIFA women’s club competitions must include at least two women among their bench staff, with at least one woman acting in an assistant coach or head coach role. The rule applies to international football and FIFA club competitions, including the U‑17 and U‑20 Women’s World Cups, Women’s Champions Cup and FIFA Women’s World Cup scheduled to take place in Brazil in 2027.
While a number of top football nations already satisfy these criteria, the rule is expected to require structural change across many teams, particularly at elite level where women remain under-represented in senior coaching roles.
FIFA has been explicit that the aim is to accelerate change by increasing visibility, creating pathways and supporting development through targeted initiatives. Alongside the regulatory change, FIFA continues to invest in coaching development programmes and access to UEFA A and Pro Licences, seeking to strengthen the pipeline of qualified women coaches. Since 2021, FIFA has supported 795 female coaches across 73 member associations through these initiatives.
In the short term, the rule increases representation on the sidelines. In the longer term, it’s intended to drive systemic change in coaching pathways and leadership structures within the sport.
From a UK employment law perspective, the rule sits at the intersection of lawful positive action and the general prohibition on sex discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 (the Act).
Sections 158 and 159 of the Act permit employers to take proportionate steps to address under-representation, but do not permit quotas or pre-determined outcomes in favour of a particular group.
In particular, section 159 allows a ‘tie-break’ provision in recruitment or promotion where an employer reasonably believes women are disadvantaged or under-represented and candidates are “as qualified as” each other on an overall assessment. Only in those circumstances may an employer favour a female candidate.
However, this provision is narrow in scope. It doesn’t permit automatic or blanket policies favouring women or preferential treatment where candidates aren’t genuinely of equal merit. Employers must therefore ensure that any reliance on positive action is evidence-based, proportionate and carefully documented and must not be implemented as an automatic or blanket policy.
The occupational requirement exception allows employers to require a role to be filled by a particular sex where this is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim and is crucial to the role. In practice, this is a high threshold and is unlikely to apply widely in the context of senior coaching appointments.
It may arise more naturally in limited contexts (such as certain medical or welfare roles) where considerations of dignity, privacy or safeguarding are engaged. Even then, employers should approach reliance on this exception cautiously and on a case-by-case basis.
Having female representation within medical or support teams may align with both regulatory compliance and player welfare considerations — particularly in youth teams. However, this should be framed primarily as a practical and cultural factor rather than a standalone legal justification.
While FIFA’s rule reflects a broader shift towards proactive diversity measures, organisations must balance inclusion objectives against the risk of reverse discrimination claims. Poorly implemented initiatives — such as informal preferences, overly prescriptive hiring mandates or insufficiently evidenced decision-making — could expose organisations to legal challenge, including direct sex discrimination claims from unsuccessful candidates. A structured, evidence-based approach is therefore essential.
Organisations seeking to align with FIFA’s requirements should take particular care in:
Guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission supports the use of transparent and consistent recruitment criteria to reduce the risk of discrimination and improve diversity outcomes.
FIFA’s new rule has implications beyond matchday compliance. It’s likely to influence governance frameworks, licensing requirements, funding criteria linked to diversity and inclusion and coaching development pathways and succession planning. NGBs in particular will need to ensure that international regulatory expectations are aligned with domestic legal obligations. In England, this role will fall to the FA.
Our employment and sports law experts support clubs, leagues and NGBs in navigating regulatory change and managing legal risk.
We can advise on:
If you’d like to discuss how these developments may affect your organisation, please get in touch by calling 0333 004 4488, emailing hello@brabners.com or completing our contact form.


Loading form...

Competing in certain women’s tournaments must now include women in coaching roles on the bench. We explore the implications for clubs and NGBs.

We explore how venue strategy has become a broader test of sustainable growth across women’s sport and outline what governing bodies and clubs can learn.

We explore what’s changing, who’s driving the changes and what it means for athletes, clubs and insurers.

We explain what sports clubs and event organisers need to know about Martyn’s Law.

We break down the key stages of a footballer’s career and outline how the right guidance safeguards their wealth and long‑term future.

We explore the key findings from the study and outline what they mean for clubs, governing bodies and others responsible for player welfare.

We explore how athletes like Cole Palmer and Luke Littler are using trade marks and outline the legal standards that they must meet.

AI is enhancing performance and even scouting future talent in elite sport. Sports technology and data are key to success, but come with legal risks.

We explore the consultation background, the regulatory concerns driving it and what it could mean for clubs with existing or future sponsorship deals.

We explore how the Premier League’s landmark shift from PSR to the new SCR and SSR systems will reshape financial regulation.

We explore how AI is influencing football on and off the pitch, highlighting the real-world examples of its impact and the risks that come with it.

We explore some of the legal considerations for clubs in ‘hiving out’ their women’s team from existing corporate structures.

At the State of Play Conference 2025, leading voices from across the sport sector shared their insights on the topic of sports technology.

Sport and entertainment are becoming increasingly intertwined, with sports and leagues forced to innovate to keep pace with trends.

The key legal considerations for clubs looking to install artificial pitches — from complying with pitch standards to construction contracts and more.

Our sports law team explores why ACL injuries are more common in female football players and what can be done.

Find out what the Supreme Court’s ruling means for policymakers, sportspeople and grassroots sport.

We outline the issues being faced by players, the actions clubs are taking and what legal protections are available to help prevent and prosecute abuse.

Athletes might be asked to provide highly sensitive forms of personal data when competing. Here's eight steps to comply with data protection legislation.

130 football stars have signed an open letter urging football’s governing body FIFA to reconsider its lucrative sponsorship deal with Aramco for the 2027 Women’s World Cup.

In HMRC v PGMOL, the Supreme Court's judgment has undermined the significance of mutuality of obligation as a legal and practical factor when assessing employment status.

Our sports technology team scan the horizon of technological development and outline the key legal considerations that sports regulators, governors and organisations must address at the outset of digital transformation.

We spoke with Rezzil's founder Andy Etches to find out how virtual technology may be increasingly used in injury prevention, treatment and recovery.

Our private client law team explore the proposed changes to the non-dom regime and how they could impact sportspeople.

Our family law experts represented a high-profile international footballer in court proceedings concerning financial support for his child.