Andy Burnham signals reform of non-compete clauses — what could change?

We explain the reforms that could be on the horizon and what employers should be doing now to prepare.
Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com | Contact us
AuthorsMatthew AstleyHelen Manterfield
4 min read

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has signalled that non-compete clauses could face significant reform, describing some employers' use of them as a "drag on innovation" and confirming that legislation will be introduced to ensure that they’ll “no longer be a barrier to hiring for our most promising startups and scaling firms”.
Speaking at the Innovation Nation Summit in Manchester last week, Burnham said that he believed some businesses had “gone too far in their use of restrictive practices such as non-compete clauses”, which seek to prevent a worker or employee (or other party, such as a contractor or shareholder) from joining a rival or establishing a competing business for a specified period after the contract ends. These are often referred to collectively as ‘restrictive covenants’.
Here, restrictive covenant litigation experts Matthew Astley and Helen Manterfield explain the reforms that could be on the horizon and what employers should be doing now to prepare.
The starting point is that all restrictive covenants are unenforceable unless it can be shown that they protect a legitimate business interest (such as customer or client connections) and go no further than is reasonably necessary to protect that interest. Careful attention and specialism are therefore needed when drafting and interpreting such clauses.
Non-compete clauses are often the most difficult of all restrictive covenants to justify because — if found to be enforceable — they can prevent competition with the enforcing business and severely restrict a person’s ability to work and earn a living.
Nevertheless, non-compete clauses have been found to be enforceable in a number of cases, particularly those involving senior employees, executives and shareholders, as well as those concerning business sale agreements.
Although it’s unclear what changes are being considered by the current Government, changes are clearly intended. These could have significant implications for employers and potentially other parties wishing to protect their commercial interests, with employers already facing big changes to the legal landscape — including in relation to the law of unfair dismissal.
It’s not the first time that reform in relation to non-compete clauses has been considered, having been the subject of a call for evidence by the UK Government in 2016, as well as consultations and working papers since that point — most recently in 2025.
Drawing on some of that subject matter, potential options for reform include:
It also remains to be seen whether any reforms would be limited to employment and worker contracts or extend beyond them, and whether they would apply only to non-compete clauses or also to other restrictions like non-solicitation and non-dealing.
With so many unknowns in an area of law that’s already complex, it’s more important than ever to have a specialist legal team in your corner.
Pending any changes to the law, businesses can take steps now to put appropriate contractual documentation in place or review existing restrictive covenants and other clauses to assess whether they provide the overall level of protection desired.
Even if changes are to be introduced in respect of non-compete clauses in due course, it may be that adequate and proportionate protection can be provided through other types of clauses, which should always be tailored to the business concerned and people involved.
With the PM himself having confirmed that legislation will be introduced, we’ll all need to watch this space. However, employers in particular should continue to monitor developments in this area and shouldn’t hesitate to contact us, either on the law as it stands now or on the proposed reforms in due course as further details emerge.
Our specialist litigation team, in conjunction with our employment law experts, has a strong track record in dealing with restrictive covenant and team move cases involving employees, contractors, shareholders and other commercial parties.
We advise clients across a wide range of sectors and can support at every stage, from drafting and reviewing contracts through to contentious matters. This includes making and opposing applications for interim injunctions relating to restrictive covenants, confidential information and trade secrets.
If you need our help, call us now on 0333 004 4488, send us an email at hello@brabners.com or complete our contact form.


Loading form...

We explain the reforms that could be on the horizon and what employers should be doing now to prepare.

Learn more about the background to the case, why the ruling matters for maternity protections in women’s football and the key lessons for football clubs.

Everton is fighting a compensation ruling that could have implications for potential claims against City, according to Coleen Rooney's lawyer, Paul Lunt.

We explore whether titles could be stripped, the appeals process, what other clubs need to know and importantly, what could happen next.

Our litigation team considers some of the libel law in play around Morgan's pursuit of legal action against the Earl and his book publisher.

We outline the legal protections that may be available if you face a threat to expose personal information such as your sexual orientation.

The Supreme Court's decision in Drelle v Servis-Terminal may provide a powerful new recovery option, with insolvency pressure able to be deployed immediately.

Amid debate over the Chelsea, Everton and Forest cases, Paul Lunt joined Total Sport to explain how football disciplinary decisions are reached and why sanctions can vary.

We outline some of the key commercial and legal considerations for parties considering a franchise arrangement.

We've announced our largest-ever round of Partner promotions, with six lawyers joining the partnership following another year of sustained growth.

We explore how the Courts determined meaning in these decisions and what they signal for future reputation management claims.

We explore how the dispute unfolded, why the courts reached different conclusions and the practical lessons that it offers for businesses.

We discuss what mediation and other forms of ADR are, their benefits, when they’re most effective and how courts view parties who refuse to engage in them.

We outline the steps that retailers can take to contain an emerging online issue and the legal remedies available for responding to false statements.

We outline the Court of Appeal’s decision, consider how the Supreme Court is likely to approach the appeal and highlight five key takeaways.

We examine the CJC’s recommendations and their implications for funders, claimants and practitioners navigating this evolving area.

We explain where generative AI has the potential to damage individuals’ reputations and examine relevant case law from other jurisdictions.

Our award-winning litigation team has secured a High Court judgment in favour of Acasta European Insurance Company Limited.

We’re delighted to announce the opening of a new office in London, marking a major milestone at the end of a year defined by strong financial performance.

We explore the types of claims that PR firms can face when an initial complaint escalates and outline some practical steps to manage the risks.

We share ten top tips for preventing partnership disputes and guidance on recognising the warning signs and responding effectively if conflict does arise.

We explore how the Court considered the requirement of promptness, the arguments made and what this means for claimants considering judicial review.

We explore the legal and reputational implications of dramatising ‘real life’ events for the screen.

We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.

Individuals who want to take an employment case to a tribunal must first take part in a longer conciliation process.