Olivia Dean & Bill Withers copyright claim — how courts judge musical similarity & access

Olivia Dean faces claims that I’ve Seen It copies Bill Withers’ Just the Two of Us, raising questions around musical similarity.
Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com | Contact us
AuthorsSamantha ThompsonColin Bell
4 min read

Ed Sheeran is not a stranger to copyright claims against his songs. In April 2022, a judge found in his favour in a claim for copyright infringement against his song Shape of You.
However, he has also been battling various copyright allegations against his song Thinking Out Loud since its release back in 2014.
Here, Samantha Thompson and Colin Bell explores the copyright claim, what a jury will be asked to decide and what the case could mean for the wider music industry.
Structured Asset Sales (the Claimant), who own one third of the copyright claim in Let’s Get It On by Marvin Gaye, issued a claim against Sheeran in 2018 alleging that Thinking Out Loud copies the “melody, rhythms, harmonies, drums, bass line, backing chorus, tempo, syncopation and looping” of Gaye’s song. Sheeran sought to get this case dismissed and called for the accusations to be dropped.
The Judge handling this case has now rejected Sheeran’s second attempt to get the case dismissed, and so the case is headed to trial.
Sheeran’s lawyers argued that the elements alleged to be infringed were unprotectable by copyright as they were too common.
However the judge held that:
“There is no bright-line rule that the combination of two unprotectable elements is insufficiently numerous to constitute an original work ... A work may be copyrightable even though it is entirely a compilation of unprotectable elements.”
Instead, the Judge has ordered that a jury must decide whether the two songs are substantially similar. In his order, Judge Stanton stated that “although the two musical compositions are not identical, a jury could find that the overlap between the songs’ combination of chord progression and harmonic rhythm is very close”.
In addition to determining whether the songs are substantially similar, the Judge has ruled that the jury must also decide whether the Claimant can include revenue from Sheeran’s concerts in the damages.
It is worth noting that this is one of three lawsuits by related parties in respect of this song. The other case by the Claimant is currently stayed and claim from a separate portion of the same estate is awaiting trial.
The prospect of a jury trial dealing with complex copyright issues — and the potential for significant damages to be awarded — may encourage Sheeran to consider settlement in this case, even if he disputes the allegations.
Alternatively, he may want to defend the case as a matter of principle, as with the Shape of You case. That said, a stark difference between the Shape of You case and this is that, in the Shape of You case, the Judge concluded that Ed Sheeran had not even heard the Claimant’s song that he was alleged to have infringed.
In this case, there is no getting away from the fact that Marvin Gaye’s Let’s Get It On will have been well known to Ed Sheeran and (if the relevant elements are held to be protectable by copyright) he could be found to have deliberately or subconsciously copied the work.
It is likely the whole of the music industry will be keeping close eye on the development of this case as well as Taylor Swift’s Shake It Off case to see how the finding may impact musical and lyrical compositions going forward.
Our experienced IP team advises artists, rights holders and creative businesses on copyright protection, clearance and infringement claims across the music industry.
For specialist support, talk to our team by calling 0333 004 4488, emailing hello@brabners.com or completing our contact form.


Loading form...

Olivia Dean faces claims that I’ve Seen It copies Bill Withers’ Just the Two of Us, raising questions around musical similarity.

How the UKIPO applied the Supreme Court’s ‘intermediate step’ in practice and what the decision may mean for the patentability of AI in the UK.

We explore the key insights shaping the future of games, digital creative and tech from this year’s FORMAT Group Summit.

Illustrator Stanley Chow has launched legal action against Reform UK over the unauthorised use of his artwork during the Makerfield by-election campaign.

We explore the Court’s approach to licensee losses and outline the key steps that IP owners and licensees should be taking to protect their position.

We explore how the dispute unfolded, why the courts reached different conclusions and the practical lessons that it offers for businesses.

We brought the retail sector together in London for a focused look at the risks, from physical threats, digital disruption and reputational challenges.

We explore how new parliamentary findings and the Government’s updated position are shifting the UK’s direction on AI and copyright.

We explain how AI patent applications are now being assessed and what this means for innovation and patent strategies.

We explore why retailers are particularly affected by deepfakes and the implications around data protection, IP, advertising compliance and more.

We explore how athletes like Cole Palmer and Luke Littler are using trade marks and outline the legal standards that they must meet.

We discuss the key opportunities and considerations shaping the future of sustainable AI and quantum‑powered technology.

We explain the importance of the Supreme Court decision and what it means for innovators looking to gain patent protection for computer-related inventions.

We outline the key takeaways from our Games Tech Connect session on how generative AI is being used in video game development.

The UK IPO's new fee structure marks its most substantial increase in decades. See the list of what's changing and why.

We explore recent examples of how brands are responding to dupe culture and outline practical steps that retail businesses can take to protect their brand.

We explore the key issues from the case and consider the practical implications for those operating in the tech, creative and data-driven sectors.

We explore the potential of AI Growth Zones to transform the region through investment and job creation while also highlighting ongoing environmental concerns.

We break down the key takeaways from the final ruling and consider what they mean for the evolving relationship between IP law and AI development.

We explore the potential impact of AI on existing copyright laws and delve into the other IP and cross-border issues that arise from the use of global AI tools.

The UKIPO is discontinuing the option to file series trade mark applications. Take a closer look at what this means for businesses and deadlines before the rule changes.

The EU Data Act is a regulation designed to reshape the European data economy by establishing harmonised rules for data access, sharing and portability.

The Product Regulation and Metrology Act is ushering in a new era for consumer protection and market oversight, laying the foundations for significant regulatory change.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has ushered in a new chapter for design protection with reforms to the legal framework governing design rights.

Our corporate team advised the shareholders of MACD throughout its acquisition by Foconis, a portfolio company of Main Capital Partners.