Regeneration for the next generation: reflections on our Making Places Work event

We reflect on the conversations and insights that emerged at the Making Places Work event.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
AuthorsIsobel McCluskeyJosephine Morton
3 min read

The Court of Appeal has provided helpful procedural guidance to social housing landlords who want to take back possession of properties from anti-social tenants who’ve been convicted of serious criminal offences.
Here, Isobel McCluskey and Josephine Morton set out the relevance of this outcome for landlords and the communities they serve.
The Court of Appeal considered the largely similar cases of Hajan v Brent LBC and Poplar HARCA v Kerr collectively.
The cases differed somewhat on the facts in that Mr Hajan held a secure tenancy and had been convicted of criminal damage. On the other hand, Mrs Kerr held an assured tenancy and had accumulated rent arrears. In addition, her son — who resided in the property — had been convicted of being in possession of an imitation firearm with the intent to cause fear of violence and sentenced to a prison term.
At the time of the convictions, the social housing landlord had already secured suspended possession orders against the tenants on discretionary grounds for anti-social behaviour (ASB).
In light of the serious convictions, the landlords wished to amend the existing proceedings to rely on the mandatory ground for possession (7a of the Housing Act 1988) and evict the tenants/occupants.
This brought about the appeals and the Court of Appeal judges considered whether landlords could amend an existing set of possession proceedings to include the mandatory ground or whether an entirely new set of possession proceedings needed to be commenced, while bearing in mind that the Housing Act 1985 prevents landlords from commencing possession proceedings until the Notice Seeking Possession (NSP) has expired.
It was argued that varying an existing set of proceedings fails to consider this.
The appeals were both dismissed. It was upheld that rather than issuing a separate set of court proceedings, landlords could simply seek to vary (amend) the existing possession proceedings that had originally been commenced on discretionary grounds for anti-social behaviour to include the relevant mandatory ground.
The Court of Appeal said that it had taken a ‘purposive approach’ when making the decision.
Paragraph 38 of the Judgment reminds us that: “The overall purpose of the mandatory ground (in both the 1985 Act and the 1988 Act) is to expedite the eviction of landlords’ most anti-social tenants to bring faster relief to victims”.
As well as alleviating the strain on limited court resources and landlords avoiding incurring the costs of a second set of proceedings with the same objective (possession), in practice this decision should enable the acceleration of possession being granted. This will undoubtedly be welcomed by both social housing landlords and the communities they serve, as well as the direct victims of anti-social behaviour.
Overall, the decision provides for possession claims that are brought on the grounds of anti-social behaviour to be dealt with more efficiently, provided that landlords follow the correct procedure and keep detailed logs of all reported incidents.
With one of the UK’s largest dedicated housing law teams, we handle the full range of matters for regional and national affordable housing providers, housebuilders and leasehold management companies.
Talk to us by giving us a call, sending us an email or completing our contact form below.
Josephine Morton
Josephine is a Partner and the joint head of our housing team, leading our housing litigation sub-team.
Read more
Isobel McCluskey
Isobel is a Solicitor Apprentice in our housing and regeneration litigation team.
Read more
Loading form...

We reflect on the conversations and insights that emerged at the Making Places Work event.

We explain the changes under the Renters Rights Act, highlight some of the key pitfalls that landlords need to be aware of and suggest ways to avoid them.

We explore the sector’s digital shift, from predictive repairs and income management to tenant engagement and the governance needed for responsible AI use.

We explain the new duty to give tenants required written information, including the official Information Sheet and key terms for new periodic tenancies.

We explore what the proposals could mean for administering authorities, participating employers, scheme members and organisations across social housing.

We look at the core changes introduced by the Mental Health Act 2025 and outline what they’re likely to mean in practice for social housing providers.

We explore how the UK’s shift to clean power is reshaping industry, infrastructure and the future of energy security.

We explore how structural, environmental and organisational shifts are shaping the 2026 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Our award-winning regeneration team has launched a new report that uncovers how life and work across the North of England has changed since the millennium.

We examine the Crime and Policing Bill's proposals and outline what RPs need to know to prepare for the changes ahead.

We explore how statutory duties introduced by Awaab's Law interact with development agreements and what social landlords need to consider going forward.

We explore the implications of Mazur, its unanswered questions and what to watch out for as the appeal progresses.

We explore the judgment and what it means for landlords when tenants refuse access for essential safety checks.

Social landlords will have greater requirements to address hazards under a phased approach starting in October 2025. Our housing law team shares how to prepare.

A reformed Decent Homes Standard (DHS) could extend minimum housing standards that landlords must provide for tenants to the private rented sector.

The UK’s housing sector in 2025 is undergoing major shifts, with Government reforms aiming to boost supply and affordability.

While seating licences can provide a flexible and short-term solution, both landlords and tenants must be cautious of their common pitfalls.

Our housing team explore what developers need to know about boundary issues — from spotting problems early to resolving disputes — to keep projects moving and stay legally compliant.

We explore the economic case for regeneration and outline three key areas that can help to get deals done and accelerate progress.

The Housing Act 1985 leaves significant room for interpretation and discretion in drafting, particularly around lease terms.

The Crime and Policing Bill 2025 is set to introduce new measures and enhanced powers to address ASB — including Respect Orders.

There are key charity law requirements and property law considerations to be aware of before a charity purchases land. Our lawyers explore.

The Renters’ Rights Bill proposes radical change to the housing law landscape and is likely to have a significant impact across both the private and social rented sectors.

Our pensions law team explore recent improvements to the LGPS funding level and share guidance for Housing Associations considering exiting the scheme.

We explore the legal and commercial considerations that underpinned the successful sport-led regeneration scheme for Bramley-Moore Dock and Liverpool Waters.