Why ‘meaning’ matters — lessons from recent defamation & malicious falsehood cases

We explore how the Courts determined meaning in these decisions and what they signal for future reputation management claims.
Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com | Contact us

We explore how the Courts determined meaning in these decisions and what they signal for future reputation management claims.

We explore the types of claims that PR firms can face when an initial complaint escalates and outline some practical steps to manage the risks.

We explore how the Court considered the requirement of promptness, the arguments made and what this means for claimants considering judicial review.

Our litigation team look an online defamation case study and how to take legal action after being subject to online defamation or harassment.

Here, commercial litigator Glyn Lancefield outlines the proposed changes to the pre-action protocol for media and communications claims.

The CJC report recommends that a bespoke Pre-Action Protocol be created for claims which, when issued at Court, will be suitable for allocation to the Multi-Track.

All civil litigation is subject to a Pre-Action Protocol which sets out the parties’ obligations before Court proceedings are commenced. The CJC states that “pre-action protocols play a crucial role in facilitating dispute resolution”.

A recent Court of Appeal judgment has major implications for litigants dealing with breach of contract claims as well as anyone drafting liability clauses in contracts.

The Supreme Court's new rules take effect on 2 December 2024 as part of its 2023-2026 business plan to deliver a wide-ranging ‘Change Programme’.

A recent Court of Appeal decision has backed the limitation of ‘standstill’ agreements.