UK’s stance on generative AI & copyright — what businesses need to know

We explore how new parliamentary findings and the Government’s updated position are shifting the UK’s direction on AI and copyright.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com

Trainee Solicitor
0161 836 8738 paddy.fearnon@brabners.com
He advises on a range of commercial matters including commercial contracts, terms and conditions and data protection, IP and is a member of our sport and technology sector teams.
Paddy completed the Legal Practice Course (LPC) and a degree in Law at De Montfort University, achieving a Distinction grade and First Class Honours, respectively.
He has practical business and legal experience gained from previous roles as a Commercial Contracts Manager, Property Damage Paralegal and a Financial Services Litigation Paralegal.
He joined Brabners in September 2024 and is based in our Manchester office.

We explore how new parliamentary findings and the Government’s updated position are shifting the UK’s direction on AI and copyright.

We explain how AI patent applications are now being assessed and what this means for innovation and patent strategies.

We explore why Paramount's bid for Warner Bros is likely to trigger intense scrutiny by UK and EU regulators.

We explain the importance of the Supreme Court decision and what it means for innovators looking to gain patent protection for computer-related inventions.

We outline the key takeaways from our Games Tech Connect session on how generative AI is being used in video game development.

Some tech businesses are exploring how their commercial frameworks could evolve through smarter, values-driven contracting.

We explore the key issues from the case and consider the practical implications for those operating in the tech, creative and data-driven sectors.

Smartphone recordings in healthcare raise legal and ethical questions. Paddy Fearnon and Thorrun Govind explore the guidance and options available to clinicians facing unauthorised recordings.

The UK Supreme Court's judgment in Brown v Ridley and Another has important implications for adverse possession claims — particularly in boundary disputes.

The High Court ruled in favour of Iya Patarkatsishvili and Yevhen Hunyak in their case against William Woodward-Fisher on claims of fraudulent misrepresentation concerning a severe moth infestation.