Katy Perry v Katie Perry — what a longstanding trade mark battle teaches businesses about brand protection
We explore how the dispute unfolded, why the courts reached different conclusions and the practical lessons that it offers for businesses.
When a couple separate it can be challenging for them to adapt to new, independent and separate lives.
There may also be a variety of complicated reasons why that separation took place including adultery, domestic abuse or a breakdown in communication.
Family lawyers are often contacted by clients to assist with separation, whether a couple have been married or in a civil partnership or where they have been living with a partner. Sometimes we will assist clients with a divorce, or dissolution of a civil partnership. Other times there may be a dispute regarding property, children or a person’s behaviour.
When you are in a relationship with someone the main remedies available to address a person’s behaviour can be found in the Family Law Act 1996. These include a non-molestation order and occupation order.
- A non-molestation order prohibits a person associated with the applicant from “molesting” them or a child. Molestation isn’t defined in law but can include threats, harassment or violence.
- An occupation order can be used alongside a non-molestation order or separately to exclude a person from a property in order to protect the applicant or a child.
Occasionally, following a difficult separation, especially where there has been a breakdown in communication, a couple may be concerned about certain things their former partner may be publishing online, or saying about them to family, friends, colleagues, work contacts or other third parties. This could include spreading statements which may have a real impact upon the person who is the subject of such comments. This may lead clients to consider whether it might be appropriate to consider defamation or other forms of civil proceedings instead of, or in addition to, family law proceedings.
A personal claim for defamation involves the publishing of a statement which lowers the individual in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally. Broadly, the test is whether a statement would cause one to think less of the person to whom it refers. A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant and this can often be a significant obstacle in any defamation claim. Defences may be based on truth, public interest, privilege or honest opinion.
Being defamed, bringing a successful defamation claim, and repairing your reputation, can often be principles which are separate and distinct from one another, and they should be weighed up individually, particularly where private events involving a personal relationship are likely to be the focal point of any legal proceedings.
It is important to carefully consider the interplay between family law proceedings and any steps that might be taken in connection with a defamation claim to avoid interfering with any strategy or objective in the divorce proceedings, for example.
There is a limited time in which to bring a defamation claim, which will be one year from the date of publication; therefore, seeking urgent advice is essential. Defamation proceedings can also be costly and take several years to be resolved.
In considering what remedies are available following separation to address your partner’s behaviour, it is important that there is a “joined up” approach between the lawyers considering both family law and civil remedies that might be available.
For further advice please speak to family lawyer Amy Harris or litigation lawyer Paul Lunt.
Related insights
Mediation & other forms of ADR — practical guidance for resolving disputes outside of court
We discuss what mediation and other forms of ADR are, their benefits, when they’re most effective and how courts view parties who refuse to engage in them.
How retailers can protect their business from false or misleading claims — key legal & practical considerations
We outline the steps that retailers can take to contain an emerging online issue and the legal remedies available for responding to false statements.
International arbitration — the scope of supervisory jurisdiction & anti-suit injunctions following Star Hydro
We outline the Court of Appeal’s decision, consider how the Supreme Court is likely to approach the appeal and highlight five key takeaways.
How the CJC’s litigation funding reforms aim to restore certainty after PACCAR
We examine the CJC’s recommendations and their implications for funders, claimants and practitioners navigating this evolving area.
3 potential ways generative AI could lead to defamation claims
We explain where generative AI has the potential to damage individuals’ reputations and examine relevant case law from other jurisdictions.
Brabners secures favourable policy construction judgment for Acasta
Our award-winning litigation team has secured a High Court judgment in favour of Acasta European Insurance Company Limited.
London expansion & record revenues drive next phase of growth at Brabners
We’re delighted to announce the opening of a new office in London, marking a major milestone at the end of a year defined by strong financial performance.
PR under fire — what happens when clients sue?
We explore the types of claims that PR firms can face when an initial complaint escalates and outline some practical steps to manage the risks.
Navigating partnership conflict in law firms — 10 top tips to prevent disputes
We share ten top tips for preventing partnership disputes and guidance on recognising the warning signs and responding effectively if conflict does arise.
HyNot judicial review decision highlights the importance of acting promptly
We explore how the Court considered the requirement of promptness, the arguments made and what this means for claimants considering judicial review.
Lights, camera, litigation — The Lost King case
We explore the legal and reputational implications of dramatising ‘real life’ events for the screen.
English Devolution & Community Empowerment Bill — what it means for retail leases
We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.
Employment tribunal early conciliation period doubles to 12 weeks
Individuals who want to take an employment case to a tribunal must first take part in a longer conciliation process.
Restrictive covenant dispute — Brabners secures successful judgment for Docutech Office Solutions Ltd
Our litigation team achieved a successful outcome for Docutech Office Solutions Ltd in a major claim against a former employee and his new employer.
How the courts treat online defamation — removal order dismissed against domain name registrar
Our litigation team look an online defamation case study and how to take legal action after being subject to online defamation or harassment.
Probate costs recoverable in litigation: SCCO clarifies its position in key costs ruling
Andrew Tindall examines new guidance from the Senior Courts Costs Office on recovering probate costs.
Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry announces publication of the first part of its final report
The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Chair has announced that the first part of his final report will be published this Summer.
Defamation and harassment on social media — what to do if you’re a victim of online abuse
Our litigation team explores recent cases and what to do if you’re subjected to online defamation or harassment.
Half-secret commissions and informed consent between brokers and customers
We explore how the Courts treat customers who have been charged “half secret” commissions by their energy brokers.
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal clarifies appropriate use of Without Prejudice labels and SLAPP guidance
Solicitor Ashley Hurst found himself at the centre of regulatory action brought by the SRA.
How to deal with a negative online review about your business
Our litigation team explores the options businesses have when it comes to dealing with negative online reviews — whether the review is honest or dishonest.
Media and communications claims — could pre-action dispute resolution become compulsory?
Here, commercial litigator Glyn Lancefield outlines the proposed changes to the pre-action protocol for media and communications claims.
Arbitration Act 2025 — new legislation to strengthen UK’s position as dispute resolution leader
Experienced commercial litigator Matthew Moy explains what arbitration is and how the AA 2025 will help to clarify and refine key aspects of the arbitration process by improving efficiency, fairness and legal certainty.
Adverse possession claims — significant judgment a ‘win’ for practicality in boundary disputes
The UK Supreme Court's judgment in Brown v Ridley and Another has important implications for adverse possession claims — particularly in boundary disputes.