Making Places Work — new study reveals the most improved places in the North of England

Our award-winning regeneration team has launched a new report that uncovers how life and work across the North of England has changed since the millennium.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
AuthorsMichael Winder
7 min read

The current public procurement regime — as embodied in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and its counterparts — is being replaced this year by the Procurement Act 2023 (the Act). A key change is the reduction in the number of procurement procedures, also known as procurement routes, available to contracting authorities in favour of fewer, more flexible, procedures.
Here, Michael Winder compares the new procurement procedures to the existing regime ahead of the Act’s introduction in February 2025.
There are a number of procurement routes under the Public Contract Regulations 2015, including:
This doesn’t include the availability of frameworks or dynamic purchasing systems as options to procurement.
Each procedure comes with its own set of mandatory minimum timescales — and there’s also a mandatory gateway that must be met before the Competitive Dialogue and Negotiated Procedures can be used. A practitioner must be fully aware not only of the overriding principles of public procurement law but also the detailed rules for operating the particular procedure they are using. There’s significant duplication and redundancy, with over 90% of public procurement occurring under either the Open or Restricted Procedures — and the Competitive Dialogue and the Negotiated Procedure being almost identical for large parts of their processes.
The new Act uses only three procedures, not including frameworks and dynamic markets (the new name for dynamic purchasing systems). This rationalisation of procurement procedures reflects the ethos behind the new Act — to create a simpler and more flexible procurement system.
The new procurement procedures are:
The Open Procedure has been carried over from the current regime. It is the only one that has a prescribed form in the Act — namely, a single stage tendering procedure without a restriction on who can submit tenders. The biggest difference between the current Open Procedure and the new one is that the minimum time limits set out between the publication of a contract notice and the deadline for the receipt of tenders is no longer procedure specific. Instead, time limits are generally dependent on other factors, as set out in s.54 of the Act. This means that the Open Procedure no longer has its own specific time limits.
This procedure is described in the Act as a competitive tendering procedure “which is such procedure as the contracting authority considers appropriate for the purpose of awarding the public contract”.
S.20 of the Act clarifies that when using this procedure, contracting authorities may:
This represents a significant shift away from the current regime. There is no mandatory process for the procedure provided that it’s “a proportionate means of awarding the public contract, having regard to the nature, complexity and cost of the contract” (as stated in the Act). Again, there are no procedure specific time limits beyond the general time limits in s.54.
This move away from a regulated framework for undertaking a procurement procedure is designed to offer more flexibility to contracting authorities and allow them to design their own procurement procedures that best fit the opportunity for which they are advertising. This helps to meet their needs without the contract in question being straitjacketed into a specific procedure. Also, a more complex procurement can require a more complex procurement procedure without any need to justify whether any gateway for such procedure is met.
It should be noted, however, that such flexibility also places a significant burden on contracting authorities. A contracting authority must ensure that whatever process they design for a specific procurement complies with the general procurement objectives and meets the proportionality requirement mentioned above. Given the increased transparency requirements woven throughout the Act, there will be greater scrutiny on the contracting authority’s approach.
At the time of writing, we note that regulation 19 of the Procurement Regulations 2024 (which expands on a number of points in the Act) sets out what would be required in a tender notice for a competitive flexible procurement.
These requirements include:
This demonstrates a need for a fully realised process to be established prior to going to market. The procedure cannot be made up ‘on the fly’.
The result of this is that while it’s intended to encourage simplicity and flexibility, contracting authorities — aware of the scrutiny upon them — may be less inclined to embrace flexibility in favour of the known quantity that a familiar structure can provide.
While the current procurement routes are bureaucratic, they’re clear on what’s required for, say, a Restricted Procedure versus Competitive Dialogue. It’s very likely that — in the early days of the new Act at least — any Competitive Flexible procedure used by a contracting authority for a covered procurement will significantly reflect one of the procedures from the current regime. Only when robust examples have been seen in the market or a specific need arises will contracting authorities start becoming brave enough to use the flexibility afforded to them.
Direct awards are available in limited circumstances under the current regime as part of the Negotiated Procedure without Prior Publication.
Under s.41, the new Act allows for direct awards — provided that one of the limited grounds in Schedule 5 is present. While this is relatively similar to the current regime, the direct award ability is widened out to additional abilities in s.42 and s.43.
The simplification and rationalisation of the procurement routes procedures has been a long time coming and is very welcome. Contracting authorities will now better understand the best route to take and/or what’s available to them. Each contracting authority has been given the ability to use a more flexible public procurement regime, which is much less prescriptive in terms of execution.
However, such flexibility does have a cost. If a contracting authority wants to make use of it, there will be a lot more work required to establish a robust procurement process — as well as documenting this process to protect against any claims that it has breached the Act or any of the subordinate regulations.
Ahead of the Act’s go-live date in February 2025, contracting authorities should consider what procurements they have coming up in the next year (now known as their ‘procurement pipeline’) and start planning for how they’ll use the new procedures to procure those contracts. It may also be worth reviewing procurement documentation now to be ready in February to commence any such procurement. Most importantly, contracting authorities must ensure that their procuring officers are fully up to date on the potential and pitfalls of the new procedures.
Our experienced public procurement lawyers are on-hand to assist contracting authorities with preparing for the new Procurement Act.
Talk to us by completing the contact form below.
Michael Winder
Michael is a Partner in our commercial team. He leads our public procurement team.
Read more
Loading form...

Our award-winning regeneration team has launched a new report that uncovers how life and work across the North of England has changed since the millennium.

We explore the new Order that gives local authorities a new ability to shape below-threshold procurement markets in ways that were previously off-limits.

We explore the upcoming changes introduced by the Procurement Act 2023, when they take effect and what they mean for contracting authorities.

We explore how contracting authorities must approach contract variations under the Procurement Act 2023.

We explore what the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill means in practice and how its reforms may affect both retail tenants and landlords.

We explore the new minimum financial thresholds that will apply to public contracts and the application of the Procurement Act 2023 from 1 January 2026.

We reveal how fire consultants and fire authority inspectors approach fire safety compliance and risk management in care homes.

Just months after the Procurement Act 2023 came into force, a new consultation signals further wide-ranging reforms — with major implications for SMEs, local jobs and national resilience.

The 2025 Spending Review marks a pivotal shift in the UK’s fiscal and industrial strategy, with significant ramifications for companies operating in the health, science & technology and defence sectors.

We explore the economic case for regeneration and outline three key areas that can help to get deals done and accelerate progress.

Under the Procurement Act, large contracting authorities can be required to publish a Pipeline Notice on the Government’s ‘Find a Tender’ online service.

Our pensions law team explore recent improvements to the LGPS funding level and share guidance for Housing Associations considering exiting the scheme.

Here, experienced procurement lawyer Michael Winder offers his top tips for how to manage PFI contract expiries.

Our procurement lawyers recap the changes introduced by the Procurement Act 2023 which all contracting authorities and companies must comply with.

The Government has revamped the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to pave the way for the delivery of 1.5m new homes over the next five years.

We've launched a new health and safety consultancy offering that helps organisations to better manage risk and prevent workplace incidents.

Following our Just Housing Conference 2024, Rupert Gill explores how the housing sector is addressing key challenges in its communities and remaining a ‘force for good’.

Here, Claudia Sivori explains how prosecutions will be brought on corporate manslaughter and Director’s duties following the Phase 2 Grenfell Report findings.

We highlight the key legal themes arising from the Grenfell Report's recommendations that you need to know about.

The Procurement Act 2023 has been delayed by four months and will now commence on 24 February 2025. Here's four practical steps for contracting authorities.

Our construction law team explores the role of the new RBCA and how to determine which regime a construction project should operate under during the transition period.

Explore the new requirements for publishing notices under the Procurement Act and the principles of transparency that underpin them.

Our construction lawyers provide an overview of the Accountable Person and Principal Accountable Person roles under the Building Safety Act 2022 and applicable secondary legislation.

It’s important for contracting authorities and bidders to understand the remedies available under the Procurement Act 2023 ahead of February 2025.

Our construction law team explores the Supreme Court ruling in Abbey Healthcare v Augusta 2008 and what it means for contractors and beneficiaries in the construction industry that rely on collateral warranties.