How athletes are protecting their brand identity against commercial & AI‑driven misuse

We explore how athletes like Cole Palmer and Luke Littler are using trade marks and outline the legal standards that they must meet.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) has recently announced its decision to discontinue the option to file series trade mark applications.
Here, Safaa Zbiri and Amy Talvet take a closer look at what this means for businesses and brands, as well as upcoming deadlines before the rule changes.
The UKIPO has published its confirmed response to the second transformation consultation, following a period of public feedback on proposals to modernise its services. Notably, the response includes the decision to discontinue the option to file series trade mark applications.
The end of the series mark stands out as a major shift in UK trade mark practice. While the exact date hasn’t yet been confirmed, the UKIPO has stated that the “series marks service will only be discontinued for new applications when the new digital trade marks service is launched”. This could be as early as autumn 2025 when the new digital patent service is due to be launched. However, there may be delays.
At present, the UKIPO allows trade mark applicants to file up to six variations of a trade mark in a single application, so long as the marks closely resemble each other in their material particulars and differ only in ways that are non-distinctive and don’t affect the overall identity of the trade mark.
Common examples of series trade marks include:
This has long proved to be a useful option for brand owners who are looking to protect slightly different versions of the same mark without filing multiple applications.
Many respondents to the consultation — including Brabners — supported the continued use of series marks, citing their cost-effectiveness, flexibility in protecting trade mark variations and their role in reducing the risk of non-use claims.
However, the UKIPO pointed to several different factors to justify its decision. In 2022, 65% of series mark applications were filed by unrepresented applicants — and of those, 39% faced objections for not meeting the necessary requirements (although by contrast, this indicates that 61% were accepted).
The UKIPO believes that the rules around series marks are often misunderstood — particularly by those without legal representation — and that since unsuccessful applications aren’t refundable, unrepresented users risk incurring higher costs through failed attempts. However, objections to series mark applications can usually by rectified by simply deleting one or more versions of the mark and avoiding additional cost.
This new approach is likely to lead to increased costs as applicants will need to file multiple applications to fully protect each different variation.
The UKIPO has also expressed its concerns that some applicants may be using series marks to “test the system” — in other words, to obtain multiple trade mark examinations at a reduced cost — although with appropriate examination, this should have been easy for the UKIPO to address.
With all this in mind — and to promote a more simplified and straightforward application process — the UKIPO has decided to phase-out series marks from September 2025.
The only good news is that existing series trade marks won’t be affected by the upcoming change, since the planned discontinuation applies only to new applications.
However, from September 2025, brand owners who had intended to rely on series marks may need to file separate applications for each variation of their trade marks, which will result in higher filing and maintenance costs. Considering this, budget-conscious businesses might opt to register only a single version — potentially leaving other important variations unprotected.
The end of series marks will mean that brand owners must carefully rethink their filing strategies — considering budget constraints, the necessity of protecting variations, the versatility of their trade marks and the importance of strong trade mark portfolio management — since each version will now require separate maintenance.
If your business currently uses multiple similar versions of a trade mark, there’s still time to make use of the series mark system.
Filing a series application before the new digital trade mark service comes into force could be a strategic and cost-effective way to secure protection for several variations within a single submission. After the cut-off date, new series applications won’t be accepted and each variation will need to be filed separately.
We recommend that any business considering new trade mark applications speaks to us as soon as possible to determine whether series applications can be used to reduce costs.
Timing is critical when navigating your filing strategy. Protecting multiple variations of your trade mark and managing your portfolio effectively can optimise costs and strengthen your brand protection.
If you need advice, get in touch with our IP experts today. Talk to us by giving us a call on 0333 004 4488, sending us an email at hello@brabners.com or completing our contact form below.
Amy Talvet
Amy is an IP Formalities Manager and CITMA Paralegal in our commercial and intellectual property team.
Read more
Loading form...

We explore how athletes like Cole Palmer and Luke Littler are using trade marks and outline the legal standards that they must meet.

We discuss the key opportunities and considerations shaping the future of sustainable AI and quantum‑powered technology.

We explain the importance of the Supreme Court decision and what it means for innovators looking to gain patent protection for computer-related inventions.

We outline the key takeaways from our Games Tech Connect session on how generative AI is being used in video game development.

We outline what you need to know about the UKIPO's proposed fee increases across patents, trade marks and designs.

We explore recent examples of how brands are responding to dupe culture and outline practical steps that retail businesses can take to protect their brand.

We explore the key issues from the case and consider the practical implications for those operating in the tech, creative and data-driven sectors.

We explore the potential of AI Growth Zones to transform the region through investment and job creation while also highlighting ongoing environmental concerns.

We break down the key takeaways from the final ruling and consider what they mean for the evolving relationship between IP law and AI development.

We explore the potential impact of AI on existing copyright laws and delve into the other IP and cross-border issues that arise from the use of global AI tools.

The EU Data Act is a regulation designed to reshape the European data economy by establishing harmonised rules for data access, sharing and portability.

The Product Regulation and Metrology Act is ushering in a new era for consumer protection and market oversight, laying the foundations for significant regulatory change.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has ushered in a new chapter for design protection with reforms to the legal framework governing design rights.

Our corporate team advised the shareholders of MACD throughout its acquisition by Foconis, a portfolio company of Main Capital Partners.

A recent change to the Jamaican law of what constitutes ‘Jamaican Rum’ has provoked great debate among rum distillers.

There are several considerations that practitioners offering these services must remain mindful of to adhere to professional standards and prioritise patient safety.

The use of AI and technology in sporting events is ever-growing — and the Paris 2024 Olympic Games were no exception.

Here, Eleanor Green provides a guide for footballers (and other athletes) looking to maximise their commercial income and maintain control over their image rights.

The legal battle between supermarkets Lidl and Tesco dealt with many interesting aspects of trade mark infringement, copyright infringement and passing off.

Our IP lawyers explore the implications of a recent case concerning intellectual property ownership and rights to income

Here's why consumers and brand owners should be aware of the risks with counterfeit goods, including health and safety.

Here we outline what smaller businesses must do to protect their IP.

Here, we explore how generative AI is transforming fashion while offering some words of warning.

For Milan Fashion Week, we explore what brands need to think about before entering into official collaborations.