The Crime & Policing Bill — what registered providers of social housing need to be aware of

We examine the Crime and Policing Bill's proposals and outline what RPs need to know to prepare for the changes ahead.
Read more
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
3 min read

We often receive requests to include a Mortgagee Protection Clause (MPC) — also known as a ‘Mortgage Cure’ clause — in residential long leases (excluding Shared Ownership) to protect the buyer's lender.
Lenders request this because they want to be notified of any lease breaches before forfeiture proceedings begin, allowing them to remedy the breach and protect their security.
Yet are such clauses always necessary? Here, we demystify MPCs and when they should be used.
There are several statutory limitations on forfeiting a residential lease, particularly under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. This legislation restricts a landlord's right to forfeit the lease, providing some protection for mortgage lenders.
If the breach involves non-payment of rent, a mortgagee can apply for relief from forfeiture or a vesting order under the Law of Property Act 1925, Section 146(4).
For breaches other than non-payment of rent, the court has the discretion to grant relief from forfeiture to the mortgage lender or make a vesting order. The extent of the court's equitable jurisdiction — especially in cases of ‘wilful breaches’ or ‘irremediable breaches’ — is debated. However, relief from forfeiture is generally preferred over a vesting order as it prevents the landlord from claiming mesne profits (rent for the relevant period) and protects against any overriding or registered interests that may have arisen since the mortgage was registered.
The key question to answer is whether including an MPC is reasonable — especially if there’s no forfeiture provision in the event of bankruptcy. Should we accept the request and include such a variation or is it unnecessary given the existing protections?
A mortgage lender must be aware of potential forfeiture to take steps to secure relief. This means that the lender might learn about proceedings too late to take remedial action.
An MPC is a fundamental clause in Shared Ownership leases due to their vulnerability to easier repossession under the Housing Act 1985 and their priority over a registered provider's security in the property.
It has become common for practitioners to demand an MPC in conventional residential leases. While remedies are available to prevent forfeiture, lenders understandably want to ensure that they’re notified of any potential breaches to protect their interests. The clause typically states that a landlord can’t forfeit without notifying the mortgagee and allowing time to remedy the breach.
In most cases, a long residential lease includes a standard forfeiture clause for breaches of covenants. A landlord would usually notify any mortgagee to allow remediation before taking forfeiture proceedings.
The UK Finance Mortgage Lenders' Handbook doesn’t require an MPC for a long residential lease to be acceptable security. Therefore, the absence of an MPC doesn’t make a lease defective.
Some suggest serving notices of transfer and charge on the landlord after completion to ensure that they’re aware of the mortgagee's interest and receive any potential forfeiture notices.
Our dedicated housing team is one of the largest in the UK and handles the full range of legal matters for the housing sector.
Talk to us by sending an email to hello@brabners.com, calling 0333 004 4488 or completing the contact form below.
Loading form...

We examine the Crime and Policing Bill's proposals and outline what RPs need to know to prepare for the changes ahead.
Read more

We explore how statutory duties introduced by Awaab's Law interact with development agreements and what social landlords need to consider going forward.
Read more

We explore the implications of Mazur, its unanswered questions and what to watch out for as the appeal progresses.
Read more