6 ways trusts can strengthen & future‑proof your estate planning

We outline six key reasons why trusts play such a central role in building a resilient and effective estate plan.
We make the difference. Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com
3 min read
Brabners Personal, Private Client & Estate Planning, Family Law, Will & Inheritance Disputes

A recent ‘threshold’ case involving the executor of a missing person’s will has significant implications for others seeking similar court declarations and the test of ‘sufficient interest’.
Here, we examine the outcome of Kerry Tolley v No Defendant (Re Caroline Fisher) and its impact on the administration of estates.
The executor of a will making a personal application for a grant (i.e., not through a solicitor) needs to provide a death certificate or obtain permission to swear an oath as to the death of the person to whom the grant application relates. In effect, the executor must prove the death and prove the will.
Difficulties arise if there is no evidence of death — for instance, if someone goes missing. In such circumstances, an application for a declaration of presumed death must be made under section 2 of the Presumption of Death Act 2013 (‘the Act’).
Under the Act, any person may make such an application, but Court must refuse it if the applicant is not a sufficiently close relative (i.e., a spouse, civil partner, parent, child or sibling) or doesn’t have ‘sufficient interest’ in the outcome of the application.
In the case of Kerry Tolley v No Defendant (Re Caroline Fisher), the Court considered whether the executor of an unproven will had ‘sufficient interest’ while not being a close relative of the person presumed to have died.
Caroline Fisher had made a Will in 2020 which appointed her close friend Kerry Tolley as the sole executor of her estate. Miss Fisher went missing in January 2022. Her parents were both deceased and she had no siblings.
In order to make an application for a Grant of Probate, Ms Tolley had to prove that Miss Fisher had died. This required a declaration of presumed death. The somewhat circular issue was whether Ms Tolley had sufficient interest as an executor of an unproven will to make the application for the declaration of presumed death, as death needed to be proven for the will to be proven.
The Judge considered this case to be a threshold question and also found there to be an unnecessary contrast between an executor applying personally (having been named in the will) and an administrator applying for a Grant of Letters of Administration (where there is no will).
The Judge noted that Ms Tolley would not be able to apply for probate without a declaration of presumption of death, but an administrator (who could merely be a creditor of the estate) could have sufficient interest.
The Judge highlighted that obtaining a declaration of presumed death was only the first step in this process. Since the applicant would still need to prove the will, they would not automatically obtain any further rights to deal with the deceased’s estate. The formal processes regarding the grant application would still need to be followed.
The Judge found that a person wishing to prove a will does have sufficient interest under section 1(5) of the Act, even though a will has not yet been proved.
In dealing with the sad circumstances surrounding Miss Fisher’s death, the Court took a sensible and proactive approach to allow her executor to progress the administration of the estate.
Find out more about our contentious probate services.

We outline six key reasons why trusts play such a central role in building a resilient and effective estate plan.

We outline the practical measures that you can take to make sure that your digital footprint is protected and managed in line with your wishes.

Find answers to our most frequently asked questions about settlement agreements and executive severance from our specialist employment lawyers.

We take a closer look at the social, demographic and economic trends that are making contentious probate expertise essential in 2026.

We explore the key inheritance tax updates to Agricultural and Business Relief announced in and after the Autumn Budget 2024.

We explore how adultery and other forms of misconduct fit into the current divorce framework and when behaviour affects the financial settlement.

We explore how the courts approach trusts on divorce and outline the key considerations for dealing with them after separation.

We explore how decisions around schools are made, the processes available to help parents to reach agreement and the court’s approach when they can't.

We explore the process of valuing a business and reaching a financial settlement upon divorce or dissolution.

We explore how the sweeping changes to inheritance tax could shape the role of prenups in protecting your wealth.

We explore how the courts approach parental contributions in divorce and the practical steps families may need to consider.

We explore how pensions are treated in divorce, from entitlement and valuation to division options.

We set out everything you need to know about financial orders — how they work, the different types and more.

We explain how and when a marriage can be annulled as well as how to know if a marriage is void or voidable.

We unpack the headline measures and present some practical steps that you can take to optimise your planning and protect your loved ones for the future.

Individuals who want to take an employment case to a tribunal must first take part in a longer conciliation process.

We explore how financial remedy proceedings work, what the court takes into account and the steps involved.

We share some top tips to help families to co‑parent amicably and organise child contact arrangements during the festive period.

We're thrilled to have been commended in three separate categories in The Times Best Law Firms 2026.

For Good Divorce Week, we explore how emotional support and legal guidance work together to reduce conflict and uncertainty.

We explore some of the key changes from the 2025 Autumn Budget that professionals should watch out for.

We explore the biological realities of menopause and the impact that it can have on divorce settlements and financial claims.

We explore why evolving tax rules are prompting more people to spend and share their wealth during their lifetime.

Some claimants have waited as long as 50 years to be recompensed, which left many families in an unfair inheritance tax (IHT) planning situation.

The importance of a Pension Sharing Order, the process for implementing one and the remedies available if one party fails to engage in that process.