Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointments — what to expect & how they work

We break down what happens at a Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) hearing and how can it help separating couples to reach a financial settlement.
Talk to us: 0333 004 4488 | hello@brabners.com | Contact us

Our medical negligence team achieved a £325,000 out of court settlement for a 60-year-old woman (‘the Claimant’) from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (“the Defendant”) in respect of a delay in diagnosis and treatment of a large peri-hepatic collection surrounding the right lobe of the liver with pockets of gas within, following a routine elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The Claimant was under the care of the Defendant surgical team for gallstones and initially investigated in 2017. The Claimant underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery on 9 March 2018, which was uneventful.
She was discharged the same day but readmitted four days later with sudden worsening of abdominal pain. Despite CT imaging indicating a “large peri hepatic collection... with pockets of gas” and ongoing deterioration, the Claimant was not sent back to theatre until 30 March.
On 22 March 2018, the Claimant was presenting symptoms of sepsis and an ultrasound demonstrated substantial subhepatic fluid collection. However, it was not until 30 March that the Claimant was taken back to theatre where she underwent surgery from which “copious bile-stained fluid” was aspirated. A diagnosis of “severe biliary peritonitis with large fluid collections in separate areas” was made. She required seven more surgical interventions and spent a prolonged period in the Intensive Care Unit. She remained in ICU until 30 April and thereafter commenced physiotherapy. She was eventually discharged on 15 May 2018. The stent was finally removed on 29 May 2019.
She was reviewed again on 11 December 2018 by the treating surgeon, who noted that she had developed a large incisional hernia which was causing major discomfort. While the hernia could be fixed, there would be high risk for adhesions, chronic pain and failure, requiring compartmental separation to fix. The Claimant had been significantly affected both physically and mentally by the previous index events and was unwilling to proceed with further surgery.
Our medical negligence specialist Fiona Tinsley obtained expert evidence from a General Surgeon, Psychologist and Expert in Care and Occupational Therapy.
It was the Claimant’s case that no reasonably competent general surgeon would fail to undertake a return to theatre in a timely manner. In addition, when in theatre, they would have carried out a copious washout and leave drains to the site of the biliary leak. The preliminary signs of sepsis could have been adequately treated.
It was admitted by the Defendant that, following the results on 24th March 2018, the failure to undertake operative intervention constituted a breach of duty of care. But for the Defendant’s breach, the Claimant would have been treated successfully. She would have avoided admission to the ICU and a laparotomy, tracheostomy, the formation of a stoma and the consequent abdominal wall failure.
The Claimant suffered extensive injury and scarring and faces a lifetime of potential complications. Her laparotomy and a requirement for further treatment for her abdominal wall failure would have been avoided. Since discharge, she has had to wear an abdominal binder. The Claimant has suffered psychological injury as a result and is unable to undertake any significant activities of a domestic nature or return to work.
Our medical negligence team worked tirelessly with the Claimant and her family to ensure that she would receive maximum compensation for her pain, suffering, loss of amenity and past and future financial loss.
The Claimant and her daughter bravely explained how the negligence had not just impacted her physically and mentally, but how it had stolen precious time with her grandchild. Her husband had described how she used to be the “lynchpin” of the family, but now she feels like a burden. A just settlement was eventually reached which will enable the Claimant to have an enhanced quality of life.
If you would like advice from our medical negligence experts, arrange a free initial chat with our friendly team.
Fiona Tinsley
Fiona is a Partner in our litigation team and our head of medical negligence and serious personal injury.

Loading form...

We break down what happens at a Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) hearing and how can it help separating couples to reach a financial settlement.

Patients and their families have received major vindication following the findings of the RCP’s initial review into treatment provided under Prof Ian Brown.

We explain the current proposals around digital Wills and highlight other Will reforms that could be on the horizon.

We explore the Court’s decision and what this evolving interpretation of ‘benefit’ could mean for trust structuring and administration.

Anne Wilkinson's husband, Trevor, died following months of radiotherapy and Temozolomide chemotherapy for a brain tumour. Now, she's demanding answers.

We outline the legal protections that may be available if you face a threat to expose personal information such as your sexual orientation.

Our specialist Deal Advisory team supported Wirral-based pharmaceutical packaging business Chester Medical on its acquisition of vitamin and health food manufacturer Power Health Products.

We explore what the decision means in practice for parties, witnesses and experts based overseas and outline when evidence can be given remotely.

Our corporate team and specialist EO solicitors supported a market-leading recruitment agency on the acquisition of an employee-owned business.

We explore the key changes to the TRS, explain what they mean in practice and outline the steps that trustees should be taking now.

We explore the role of a Letter of Claim during Will and inheritance disputes and outline what it means for those involved.

We explore what the new IHT rules mean for family businesses and how a Family Constitution can guide the decisions that follow.

We outline what’s changed and how it could affect your Will in practice.

We explore the potential impact of the Government's consultation and outline the practical steps that you can take to prepare.

We explore the key inheritance tax updates to Agricultural and Business Relief announced in and after the Autumn Budget 2024.

Prof Ian Brown's patients were told that treatment was lifesaving but UHCW later confirmed it was neither evidence-based nor aligned with NICE guidance.

We explain what ‘dementia-proofing’ your assets involves and outline five practical steps that you can take to protect your wishes, family and finances.

We delve into the new data, what it tells us about the ‘modern family’ and the steps that cohabiting couples should take to protect their rights.

Our serious personal injury team successfully secured £125,000 for a young part‑time worker who suffered a serious crush injury.

We outline how an overseas marriage is treated under English and Welsh law for anyone considering divorce.

We break down the key stages of a footballer’s career and outline how the right guidance safeguards their wealth and long‑term future.

We outline six key reasons why trusts play such a central role in building a resilient and effective estate plan.

Despite guidelines recommending a maximum of six chemotherapy cycles, Lucy was prescribed over 75 across seven years — long after her scans showed no evidence of progression.

We outline the practical measures that you can take to make sure that your digital footprint is protected and managed in line with your wishes.

Across the UK, neurosurgery and neuro-oncology services at several NHS Trusts have been subject to independent reviews, regulatory scrutiny and (in some cases) Police investigations.